Achievement as the Product of Empowerment

---

 Empowerment and achievement exist in a mutually reinforcing relationship. Achievement often begins when individuals possess the authority, knowledge, competence, and confidence needed to accomplish meaningful goals. Empowerment occurs when leaders share leadership responsibilities with followers and create opportunities for meaningful participation in organizational decision-making (Jung et al., 2020; Kessler, 2013). Rather than concentrating authority exclusively in leadership positions, empowerment enables followers to contribute their talents, creativity, and expertise toward achieving shared organizational goals (Yang, 2015). As followers experience greater levels of empowerment, they become more engaged in their work and more committed to achieving desired outcomes (Zaman et al., 2017). 

The relationship between empowerment and achievement extends beyond organizational performance. Empowerment influences the psychological factors that support sustained achievement and human flourishing. My research found that a follower's sense of empowerment positively related to perceptions of eudaimonic happiness, particularly in the areas of sense of purpose and purposeful personal expressiveness (Lewis, 2022). Eudaimonic happiness emerges when individuals develop their fullest potential and obtain fulfillment through a sense of purpose, purposeful personal expressiveness, and effortful engagement (Schutte et al., 2013; Waterman et al., 2010). These characteristics contribute directly to achievement because individuals who understand their purpose and find meaning in their work demonstrate greater persistence and commitment when pursuing goals (Ryff, 2013; Schutte et al., 2013). 

Achievement involves more than the attainment of external rewards or organizational objectives. True achievement occurs when individuals realize their potential while making meaningful contributions to others and their organizations (Lewis, 2022). Empowerment facilitates this process by fostering autonomy, encouraging initiative, and creating opportunities for growth (Yang, 2015). Empowered followers become active participants rather than passive recipients of leadership decisions. They develop the confidence needed to solve problems, make informed decisions, and contribute innovative ideas that improve organizational outcomes (Miranda, 2019; Zaman et al., 2017). 

Research (Lewis, 2022) consistently demonstrated that empowered individuals experience higher levels of motivation, engagement, and organizational commitment (Duari & Sia, 2013; Sharifzadeh & Almaraz, 2014). Increased empowerment is positively correlated with enhanced perceptions of happiness and well-being, which in turn support improved productivity and organizational effectiveness (Switzer, 2008; Turban & Wan, 2016; Zaman et al., 2017). When individuals believe they have meaningful influence within an organization, they are more likely to invest effort into achieving both personal and organizational goals. Effortful engagement, one of the key components of eudaimonic happiness, encourages individuals to persevere even when faced with significant challenges (Schutte et al., 2013). 

Leaders have an ethical responsibility to create environments in which followers can flourish and reach their potential (Johnson, 2019; Veenhoven, 2015). Ethical leadership recognizes that organizational success and individual well-being are not competing priorities. Instead, they function in a mutually beneficial relationship. Empowering leaders develop the competence, confidence, and capabilities of their followers while simultaneously improving organizational performance (Yang, 2015). The findings of my study suggest that empowerment is an important pathway to achievement because it strengthens the psychological foundations of purpose, engagement, and personal fulfillment (Lewis, 2022). 

 Ultimately, empowerment transforms achievement from the simple completion of tasks into the pursuit of meaningful excellence. When leaders empower followers, they create conditions that encourage growth, foster engagement, and promote human flourishing. Achievement becomes more than reaching a destination. It becomes the process through which individuals develop their abilities, contribute to shared goals, and experience the fulfillment associated with living and working at their fullest potential (Moran, 2018; Waterman et al., 2010). 

Duari, P., & Sia, S. K. (2013). Importance of happiness at the workplace. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 453-456.

Johnson, G. (2019). Organizational ethics: A practical approach (4th ed.). Sage.

Jung, K., Kang, S., & Suk Bong, C. (2020). Empowering leadership, risk-taking behavior, and employees’ commitment to organizational change: The mediated moderating role of task complexity. Sustainability, 12(6), 2340.

Kessler, V. (2013). Pitfalls in 'Biblical' leadership. Verbum Et Ecclesia, 34(1), 1-7.

Lewis, D. T. (2022). The impact of followers' sense of empowerment on their perception of eudaimonic happiness (Publication No. if assigned) [Doctoral dissertation, Trevecca Nazarene University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.  

Miranda, S. R. (2019). Preferred leadership styles by gender. The Journal of Management Development, 38(7), 604-615.

Moran, J. (2018). Aristotle on eudaimonia (‘happiness’). Think, 17(48), 91-99.  

Ryff, C., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic 

approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0

Schutte, L., Wissing, M., & Khumalo, I. (2013). Further validation of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB). Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 3(1), 1-22

Switzer, C. (2008). Time for change: Empowering organizations to succeed in the knowledge economy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(2), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810859488

Veenhoven, R. (2017). Measures of Happiness: Which to Choose? In G. Brulé & F. Maggino (Eds.) Metrics of Subjective Well-Being: Limits and Improvements. Springer.  

Waterman, A., Schwartzb, S., Zamboangac, B., Ravertd., R., Williamse, M., Agochae, B., Kimf, S., Donnellang, B. (2010, January). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41–61.